Other Companies Being Hurt by General Motors Cuts
WNEM TV 5
http://www.wnem.com/video/19670539/index.html
Friday, June 5, 2009
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
Lost auto jobs cause shrinkage elsewhere, businessmen tell Dave Camp
Auto Suppliers Feel the Pinch
A Company that Makes Safety Glasses Reflects Detroit Three Woes
by Barrie Barber The Saginaw News
Friday May 29, 2009, 1:22 PM
Friday May 29, 2009, 1:22 PM
Hi-Tech Optical Inc. in Saginaw Township had 50 employees in 2003.
But because of disappearing jobs in the auto industry, the optical maker's workforce has shrunk to 18, said President Thomas M. Ryan.
The reason: Fewer auto workers greatly reduced demand for the safety glasses that Hi-Tech Optical grinds out.
"There's losses that trickle all the way down the supply chain," he said. "It's more far-reaching than people realize."
The company's story was one of about a half-dozen that U.S. Rep. Dave Camp heard when he met with a group of small business owners today as General Motors Corp. appears headed for bankruptcy court by a White House-imposed Monday deadline.
Camp, a Midland Republican who toured the lens grinding facility at 3139 Christy Way, listened to pleas to find ways to loosen the pursue strings for financing to small business owners struggling in a sea of uncertainty and the hope for more money to boost Michigan's alternative energy industry.
The ranking Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, Camp said he would approach the U.S. Treasury Department to find ways to get financing for businesses.
He also said the federal government should let people who know the industry run it. He has called the Monday make-or-break date an "artificial deadline."
"I don't think the automakers should have been pushed into bankruptcy, but they are and we have to deal with the reality of the situation," Camp said.
He opposes "cap and trade" emissions legislation on grounds it could further devastate Michigan industries while China and India are exempt from the same pollution standards. He also called for greater use of "clean coal" power plants, natural gas and nuclear energy in addition to renewable sources to build the economy.
Auto industry woes have heaped pain on suppliers, businessman told Camp. At Hi-Tech, for example, auto-related accounts brought in $906,353 in 2006. Last year, that plummeted to $284,264.
"A few years ago, Delphi was one of our major accounts, and now it's just a small part of our business," Ryan said. "We can't put glasses on robots and we can't put glasses on nonexistent people."
The company has attempted to diversify into other states, he said.
Wright-K Technology Inc. has faced a major decline in auto-related business over the last decade or so, said Chairman John P. Sivey. The custom machinery manufacturer at 2025 E. Genesee in Saginaw once had $10 million in sales to Delphi.
"We don't do $50,000 today," he said, also emphasizing the need for financing. "There's nothing available to get. You can't get blood from a rock, and you're looking at the rock right here."
But because of disappearing jobs in the auto industry, the optical maker's workforce has shrunk to 18, said President Thomas M. Ryan.
The reason: Fewer auto workers greatly reduced demand for the safety glasses that Hi-Tech Optical grinds out.
"There's losses that trickle all the way down the supply chain," he said. "It's more far-reaching than people realize."
The company's story was one of about a half-dozen that U.S. Rep. Dave Camp heard when he met with a group of small business owners today as General Motors Corp. appears headed for bankruptcy court by a White House-imposed Monday deadline.
Camp, a Midland Republican who toured the lens grinding facility at 3139 Christy Way, listened to pleas to find ways to loosen the pursue strings for financing to small business owners struggling in a sea of uncertainty and the hope for more money to boost Michigan's alternative energy industry.
The ranking Republican on the House Ways and Means Committee, Camp said he would approach the U.S. Treasury Department to find ways to get financing for businesses.
He also said the federal government should let people who know the industry run it. He has called the Monday make-or-break date an "artificial deadline."
"I don't think the automakers should have been pushed into bankruptcy, but they are and we have to deal with the reality of the situation," Camp said.
He opposes "cap and trade" emissions legislation on grounds it could further devastate Michigan industries while China and India are exempt from the same pollution standards. He also called for greater use of "clean coal" power plants, natural gas and nuclear energy in addition to renewable sources to build the economy.
Auto industry woes have heaped pain on suppliers, businessman told Camp. At Hi-Tech, for example, auto-related accounts brought in $906,353 in 2006. Last year, that plummeted to $284,264.
"A few years ago, Delphi was one of our major accounts, and now it's just a small part of our business," Ryan said. "We can't put glasses on robots and we can't put glasses on nonexistent people."
The company has attempted to diversify into other states, he said.
Wright-K Technology Inc. has faced a major decline in auto-related business over the last decade or so, said Chairman John P. Sivey. The custom machinery manufacturer at 2025 E. Genesee in Saginaw once had $10 million in sales to Delphi.
"We don't do $50,000 today," he said, also emphasizing the need for financing. "There's nothing available to get. You can't get blood from a rock, and you're looking at the rock right here."
Congressman Dave Camp tours auto suppliers
.jpg)
By Dave Kinchen Friday, May 29, 2009 at 6:54 p.m.
Driving down Bay Road in Saginaw Township, you might not think one of the businesses you see there would be a parts supplier to General Motors and Delphi. Hi-Tech Optical is a smaller operation with a staff of about 50 people, but with a big contribution to the auto industry.
It produces prescription safety glasses for auto plant workers. This was also the site of Friday’s visit by US Rep. Dave Camp (R-Midland). Camp was on tour of Mid-Michigan businesses connected to the auto industry and heard the story of this company, which has developed fears over the future of their business in light of the current automotive restructuring, bankruptcy of Chrysler, a possible fate for General Motors as well.
At one point, Hi-Tech Optical made safety glasses for 40 Delphi plants. Owner Tom Ryan said nowadays it’s a different story.
“We were able to save Delphi over a million and a half dollars in their prescription eye care program. We thought we were doing everything good and beneficial for Delphi. All of the sudden, in a year our 40 plants dwindled from 40 to 35; down to 30. Today we are doing about 8 plants for Delphi,” Ryan said.
Congressman Camp said his tour of the facility was revealing.
“It’s impressive to see some of the quality work being done but really how something like safety glasses you might not think as related to the auto industry really is and how interconnected manufacturing is in this state,” Camp said.
“It’s impressive to see some of the quality work being done but really how something like safety glasses you might not think as related to the auto industry really is and how interconnected manufacturing is in this state,” Camp said.
It is that interconnectedness that is at risk with Chrysler in bankruptcy and General Motors on the brink. While touring Hi-Tech Optical, Camp talked with Ryan and other business leaders about the risks of a GM bankruptcy and the importance of restoring the Big Three to viability.
“I think certainty is very important,” Camp said. “As we look ahead, a long bankruptcy just creates more uncertainty for both consumers as well as suppliers. They can’t really wait so I think that it’s very important that if they go in, that it’s done as quickly as possible.”
Camp also met with representatives from the Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce and the wind turbine industry.
“I think certainty is very important,” Camp said. “As we look ahead, a long bankruptcy just creates more uncertainty for both consumers as well as suppliers. They can’t really wait so I think that it’s very important that if they go in, that it’s done as quickly as possible.”
Camp also met with representatives from the Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce and the wind turbine industry.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Customers Can SEE the Quality in Hi-Tech Optical, Inc.
Hi-Tech Optical would like to thank all of our loyal customers for voting us BEST OF THE BEST Eyewear Shop and Locally Owned Business for 2008 for the Saginaw News!
Customer Service, Money and Time Savings, Quality and Caring are just a few words used to describe the Quality Service they receive when they visit Hi-Tech Optical, Inc.
Customer Service- Hi-Tech Optical’s Opticians are highly trained and experienced. They do not work on commission, they just want to help you receive the best experience.
Manufacturer- Hi-Tech is the manufacturer, you receive factory direct pricing every time. If you need any repairs or an emergency comes up, we can fix the problem right now, right on the spot.
Time- Because Hi-Tech Optical is the manufacturer, you don’t have to wait a week to get your eyeglasses back. We can get them out in 3-5 days or sooner!
Family- Hi-Tech Optical believes in family. The staff that makes up the Hi-Tech Optical family have all been here 5-30 years each! We have father/daughter co-workers, sister/sister co-workers, etc. Hi-Tech Optical wouldn’t be who they are without family.
Veteran and locally owned- Hi-Tech Optical loves Michigan and wants to keep it alive! Our owner is local and is a Vietnam War Veteran. That’s something to be proud of!
Quality- We recognize that our reputation hinges on the quality of the goods and services we produce. Our timeliness and experience ensures our success.
Large Variety- Hi-Tech Optical has over 1,500 frames on display. We carry all the Designers, Childrens’ glasses, Safety glasses, Sunglasses, etc. There is something for everyone!
It’s no surprise that people see the quality in Hi-Tech Optical. It shows in their service, in their pride and in their products!
Hi-Tech Optical is located at 3139 Christy Way, behind Jack’s Fruit Market on Bay Road. The phone number is 989-799-9390. Hi-Tech is open 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday – Friday and Wednesdays 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eye exams are by appointment on Wednesdays from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Customers can SEE they are receiving the best value at Hi-Tech Optical.
Customer Service, Money and Time Savings, Quality and Caring are just a few words used to describe the Quality Service they receive when they visit Hi-Tech Optical, Inc.Customer Service- Hi-Tech Optical’s Opticians are highly trained and experienced. They do not work on commission, they just want to help you receive the best experience.
Manufacturer- Hi-Tech is the manufacturer, you receive factory direct pricing every time. If you need any repairs or an emergency comes up, we can fix the problem right now, right on the spot.
Time- Because Hi-Tech Optical is the manufacturer, you don’t have to wait a week to get your eyeglasses back. We can get them out in 3-5 days or sooner!
Family- Hi-Tech Optical believes in family. The staff that makes up the Hi-Tech Optical family have all been here 5-30 years each! We have father/daughter co-workers, sister/sister co-workers, etc. Hi-Tech Optical wouldn’t be who they are without family.
Veteran and locally owned- Hi-Tech Optical loves Michigan and wants to keep it alive! Our owner is local and is a Vietnam War Veteran. That’s something to be proud of!
Quality- We recognize that our reputation hinges on the quality of the goods and services we produce. Our timeliness and experience ensures our success.
Large Variety- Hi-Tech Optical has over 1,500 frames on display. We carry all the Designers, Childrens’ glasses, Safety glasses, Sunglasses, etc. There is something for everyone!
It’s no surprise that people see the quality in Hi-Tech Optical. It shows in their service, in their pride and in their products!
Hi-Tech Optical is located at 3139 Christy Way, behind Jack’s Fruit Market on Bay Road. The phone number is 989-799-9390. Hi-Tech is open 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. Monday – Friday and Wednesdays 8 a.m. to 7 p.m. Eye exams are by appointment on Wednesdays from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Customers can SEE they are receiving the best value at Hi-Tech Optical.
Monday, February 18, 2008
Hi-Tech Optical-Contractor of the Year
From: Saginaw Future Inc. 2007 Annual Report
Hi-Tech Optical, Inc. has been selected as the Saginaw Future Procurement Technical Assistance Center Contractor of the Year. The company is a manufacturer of prescription safety glasses and offers hundreds of styles of safety frames.
Hi-Tech Optical, located at 3139 Christy Way in Saginaw Charter Township, is a preferred eyewear supplier to several well known manufacturers.
Hi-Tech Optical recently was awarded a prescription safety glasses contract for the Department of the Navy valued at $1.8 million over a five-year period. The contract has led to the creation of four new jobs and the retention of 18 employees. The Saginaw Future PTAC assisted the company with bid preparation and research. In 2006, Hi-Tech Optical invested $198,500 in an expansion project that created five jobs.
Hi-Tech specializes in comprehensive, turnkey safety eyeglass programs. As one of the Midwest’s largest safety optical laboratories, the company serves employees and retirees of the nation’s largest industrial plants, as well as ophthalmologists and optometrists. Cost containment, verified eligibility, multiple location and Freedom of Choice doctor participation plans are among the programs offered.
In 1940, Columbus-based White Haines Co. opened an office in Saginaw, Michigan, and moved to the Christy Way location in 1971. In early 1987, a group of local investors teamed up to purchase the Saginaw office from White-Haines, and in doing so, formed Hi-Tech Optical, Inc.
Friday, September 21, 2007
A Harder Sell
“A Harder Sell”By Jerry Laws February 2006
From the February 2006 issue of Occupational Health & Safety"
We believe there's only a 50 percent, at best, compliance with prescription eyewear programs in manufacturing facilities."
Editor's note: Broad changes in the U.S. manufacturing sector and within the safety industry have made it more difficult to sell prescription safety glasses to employees, who collectively pay an increasing percentage of the glasses' cost, say Titmus Optical, Inc.'s Mike Franz, senior marketing/product manager, protective products, and Joe Parsons, director of sales. Titmus, an ISO 9001:2000 certified manufacturer of vision screening equipment and a leading supplier of premium prescription safety eyeglass frames (http://www.titmus.com/), is based in Petersburg, Va. Franz and Parsons discussed these trends Dec. 2, 2005, with Occupational Health & Safety's editor. Excerpts from the conversation follow:
Are the protective products available to workers these days any different or better at protecting against these hazards?Parsons: That's something we've been working on a great deal and have some new products coming to market. I think for the past 20 years--I started in the business in '78--and I think for the last decade or so, we really swung to the fashion side of protective eyewear.We tried to get it to where it was cosmetically and aesthetically nice to wear, but I don't know that we did a lot of things to improve necessarily the protection aspect, especially on prescription eyewear. As trends got smaller in dress eyewear, we got smaller in safety glasses.Right.Parsons: But what has been the situation in the last three to five years--and this could be economically driven--companies are no longer as concerned about aesthetics . . . but have swung back now [to] protection. More protective than what we've been in the past seems to be an issue. We, like many other companies, are really looking at protecting the eye cavity and doing things differently than we've done in the past eight to 10 years or so.That's interesting. I know the pendulum swung significantly toward style. I'm not surprised this change is happening, but I wasn't aware it was happening.Mike Franz: If you go back to the ANSI standard of 1968, it was a design standard. Safety prescription eyewear had to meet design criteria. Each time the standard is updated, OSHA expects ANSI to increase the stringency of what those protective devices are able to accomplish.In 1989, the standard became a performance standard. That is, design was left to the manufacturer's responsibility, but whatever resulted had to pass these tough performance tests. That was a huge, major, watershed event in terms of how we as manufacturers looked at the product. Frankly, it allowed us to continue going more toward a fashionable product, but one which has a high level of performance. Because if you go back to the late '70s and early '80s, compliance by the factory worker was a huge issue because the product was unsightly. When we started going toward a more fashionable look, what that did was increase compliance a great deal among the workers where programs were present.As we return to the idea that products should be more protective, what goes into that? A different material? A different thickness or size of the product?Parsons: I'll tell you what has driven this. We've had two issues that seem to have really come to the front in the last year or two. [One is] dust particles. There's not the major, high-impact type of injuries that happen. It seems people are more having particles come from the top or the side. A lot of times, what we're found is, a guy can wear a hard hat and wear safety glasses. And when he goes to take off his hard hat, there have been particles that have been underneath the hard hat, he takes it off, and they come down behind his safety glasses and get into his eye. It may just be a small particulate that has gotten into the guy's eye, but he ends up going to the emergency room or whatever to have this thing removed and flushed out, and it ends up being a reported injury.People are asking more for dust protectants and brow guards. We've seen a big rush to what we call an insert, where they're taking a larger, full-face plano glass and putting a prescription insert behind that.I see.Parsons: I mentioned this to Mike yesterday, and we really agreed about a couple of issues in our industry. We've got a very much diminishing labor force, obviously, as plants continue to downsize and go offshore with their manufacturing. So we look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics [data] about the decreasing amount of injuries: A lot of that has been based on just having smaller workforces.I've definitely thought much of it is just the way the economy is moving.Parsons: We've become much more robotic and automated in the manufacturing process.Are you talking about eyewear manufacturing or manufacturing in general?Parsons: Just in manufacturing in general. When you go in plants, you've got robots that are now spot welding and painting, and all those kinds of things. So you don't have the number of employees nor the employees doing possibly hazardous, repetitive jobs.Those things have to be taken into account when we look at the variety of eye injuries, as they are declining. That plays a major role, I think, in the percentages and so forth.It suggests, I guess, that industry as a whole isn't a lot safer. Because the injuries haven't been going down as far as they should with those kinds of changes going on.Parsons: I brought some statistics in with me. When I looked at these, one of them is from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site: 11.9 eye injuries per 10,000 workers in 1992 to 5.9 per 10,000 in 2000. So in eight years, they went down by about 50 percent.Franz: This goes directly to the comment you made. You asked us if we thought in fact eye injuries really weren't declining because the workforce was declining. This really flies in the face of that; what it says in fact is they are. The rate has changed remarkably.Okay. And that's partly what Joe was reporting a second ago--the change in what kind of work is being done?Parsons: That's exactly right.Franz: Partially. And it's also because people, I think, are wearing their safety eyewear more than they used to because they wear their safety eyewear all the time.Right. And fashion had a role to play in making that happen.Franz: Yes.Parsons: And it's the type of manufacturing. When we go back, looking in 1992, there was probably a whole lot more heavy manufacturing than there is now in 2005.I think that must be true. Given what Ford and GM are announcing, soon there will be even less heavy manufacturing than there is now.Parsons: Here's the issue that we have: We know based on our own surveys--and we've made thousands of phone calls, up into the 5,000 and 6,000 range, randomly calling manufacturing facilities--we believe there's only a 50 percent, at best, compliance with prescription eyewear programs in manufacturing facilities.When we call these places and we ask them whether they have a safety eyewear program, the first answer that we get is always yes. We follow that up with, "Who is your provider for prescription eyewear?" There's dead silence on the phone. Most of them give out over-the-glass or planos but don't have a prescription eyewear program. So we know there's a major need for improved compliance . . . .In this area of have injuries been reduced, and are they falling or rising--the Prevent Blindness America Web site tells us that there are still over 700,000 work-related eye injuries every year. To me, 700,000 is a lot.Your point is well taken. These calls and surveys you're taking, is this more the case now than ever before? Or has it always been true that companies don't have prescription safety eyewear programs?Parsons: I would say it's pretty much always been true.To what do you attribute that? They're not thinking in those terms?Parsons: As budgets have been cut and as safety professionals a lot of the time have been cut from budgets, they still continue to hit the real priority safety things, which would be hazardous chemicals and electrical and things like that. But eye protection and some other issues that might not be considered high-visibility--they don't get the same amount of effort put behind them.How can this be reversed? And who else is working to reverse it?Parsons: We have really tried to work with Prevent Blindness, with organizations like ASSE and VPPPA, the ISEA group.It's just a matter of at what level does education overcome economics. I really believe that, as much as we try to educate--and we do a lot of that through media such as yourselves and through training classes, and wherever we can speak at VPPPA or ASSE--but it still comes down that the industry and the safety professional, either on site or coming in, has to try to address these things. And they really don't hit it that well.Franz: In effect, safety is a tough sell. You can't sell it with the threat of danger and bad things happening. People don't react to that. The fact that we had to legislate seat belts in automobiles kind of tells you that.Parsons: It's hard to find safety professionals in a lot of these plants these days to work with us.That's got to be frustrating.Parsons: It is. It's tough enough to get into a plant to start with or even talk with one because of emails and voicemails and all that. But once you do get in, to find someone who actually can implement a program or has that authority is a very difficult issue today. And I know that that's affecting compliance. Every year it becomes more difficult to enact compliance, if you will.In your surveys, you do get some of these people on the phone. You say they don't have such programs now; do you make any headway? When you explain what you're talking about, are they interested? Do they want to follow up?Parsons: I would say it's not even 1 percent. . . . A lot of companies, years ago, allowed their employees to purchase prescription eyewear through some sort of payroll deduction. What has happened with the financial cuts--I'll give you an example. I went into a manufacturing company in Maryland. The safety director was still there, the guy responsible for safety. They had an eyewear program on the books--in other words, they had documentation of what it consisted of. This guy had been in that plant in that job for over four years and said in the past two years, no one had purchased a pair of safety glasses.I said to him, "Whose fault is that? Are you not forcing the folks into compliance?" He said, "I'll tell you what happened. They moved our finance department off site. It is now done through a central finance division somewhere else. We no longer have payroll deduction available at this facility."I don't know, 80 percent of the eyewear purchased probably has some [financial] participation by the employee. There's only probably 20 percent of the companies, mostly major corporations, that pay 100 percent of the program. Where it is all employee-funded, what we are finding is the employees opt not to get a pair of glasses every year that they may be applicable. They may stretch it out to five or six years, which means they're wearing a prescription that might be outdated, which leads to quality issues and vision issues----and safety issues.Parsons: A lot of that is because they can't stretch out their payments for a pair of glasses over three or four paychecks or something. It all comes back, I think, to finance. From the company's standpoint, they've eliminated the safety person or they've eliminated some part of the program itself.That's a sobering thought. What do you think can be done?Parsons: Somewhere, obviously, this education process has to get back to the industry. I don't think we have that answer. Mike and I talked about it; there's not a simple answer to the thing.
To view full article: http://www.ohsonline.com/articles/44966/
Editor's note: Broad changes in the U.S. manufacturing sector and within the safety industry have made it more difficult to sell prescription safety glasses to employees, who collectively pay an increasing percentage of the glasses' cost, say Titmus Optical, Inc.'s Mike Franz, senior marketing/product manager, protective products, and Joe Parsons, director of sales. Titmus, an ISO 9001:2000 certified manufacturer of vision screening equipment and a leading supplier of premium prescription safety eyeglass frames (http://www.titmus.com/), is based in Petersburg, Va. Franz and Parsons discussed these trends Dec. 2, 2005, with Occupational Health & Safety's editor. Excerpts from the conversation follow:
Are the protective products available to workers these days any different or better at protecting against these hazards?Parsons: That's something we've been working on a great deal and have some new products coming to market. I think for the past 20 years--I started in the business in '78--and I think for the last decade or so, we really swung to the fashion side of protective eyewear.We tried to get it to where it was cosmetically and aesthetically nice to wear, but I don't know that we did a lot of things to improve necessarily the protection aspect, especially on prescription eyewear. As trends got smaller in dress eyewear, we got smaller in safety glasses.Right.Parsons: But what has been the situation in the last three to five years--and this could be economically driven--companies are no longer as concerned about aesthetics . . . but have swung back now [to] protection. More protective than what we've been in the past seems to be an issue. We, like many other companies, are really looking at protecting the eye cavity and doing things differently than we've done in the past eight to 10 years or so.That's interesting. I know the pendulum swung significantly toward style. I'm not surprised this change is happening, but I wasn't aware it was happening.Mike Franz: If you go back to the ANSI standard of 1968, it was a design standard. Safety prescription eyewear had to meet design criteria. Each time the standard is updated, OSHA expects ANSI to increase the stringency of what those protective devices are able to accomplish.In 1989, the standard became a performance standard. That is, design was left to the manufacturer's responsibility, but whatever resulted had to pass these tough performance tests. That was a huge, major, watershed event in terms of how we as manufacturers looked at the product. Frankly, it allowed us to continue going more toward a fashionable product, but one which has a high level of performance. Because if you go back to the late '70s and early '80s, compliance by the factory worker was a huge issue because the product was unsightly. When we started going toward a more fashionable look, what that did was increase compliance a great deal among the workers where programs were present.As we return to the idea that products should be more protective, what goes into that? A different material? A different thickness or size of the product?Parsons: I'll tell you what has driven this. We've had two issues that seem to have really come to the front in the last year or two. [One is] dust particles. There's not the major, high-impact type of injuries that happen. It seems people are more having particles come from the top or the side. A lot of times, what we're found is, a guy can wear a hard hat and wear safety glasses. And when he goes to take off his hard hat, there have been particles that have been underneath the hard hat, he takes it off, and they come down behind his safety glasses and get into his eye. It may just be a small particulate that has gotten into the guy's eye, but he ends up going to the emergency room or whatever to have this thing removed and flushed out, and it ends up being a reported injury.People are asking more for dust protectants and brow guards. We've seen a big rush to what we call an insert, where they're taking a larger, full-face plano glass and putting a prescription insert behind that.I see.Parsons: I mentioned this to Mike yesterday, and we really agreed about a couple of issues in our industry. We've got a very much diminishing labor force, obviously, as plants continue to downsize and go offshore with their manufacturing. So we look at the Bureau of Labor Statistics [data] about the decreasing amount of injuries: A lot of that has been based on just having smaller workforces.I've definitely thought much of it is just the way the economy is moving.Parsons: We've become much more robotic and automated in the manufacturing process.Are you talking about eyewear manufacturing or manufacturing in general?Parsons: Just in manufacturing in general. When you go in plants, you've got robots that are now spot welding and painting, and all those kinds of things. So you don't have the number of employees nor the employees doing possibly hazardous, repetitive jobs.Those things have to be taken into account when we look at the variety of eye injuries, as they are declining. That plays a major role, I think, in the percentages and so forth.It suggests, I guess, that industry as a whole isn't a lot safer. Because the injuries haven't been going down as far as they should with those kinds of changes going on.Parsons: I brought some statistics in with me. When I looked at these, one of them is from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Web site: 11.9 eye injuries per 10,000 workers in 1992 to 5.9 per 10,000 in 2000. So in eight years, they went down by about 50 percent.Franz: This goes directly to the comment you made. You asked us if we thought in fact eye injuries really weren't declining because the workforce was declining. This really flies in the face of that; what it says in fact is they are. The rate has changed remarkably.Okay. And that's partly what Joe was reporting a second ago--the change in what kind of work is being done?Parsons: That's exactly right.Franz: Partially. And it's also because people, I think, are wearing their safety eyewear more than they used to because they wear their safety eyewear all the time.Right. And fashion had a role to play in making that happen.Franz: Yes.Parsons: And it's the type of manufacturing. When we go back, looking in 1992, there was probably a whole lot more heavy manufacturing than there is now in 2005.I think that must be true. Given what Ford and GM are announcing, soon there will be even less heavy manufacturing than there is now.Parsons: Here's the issue that we have: We know based on our own surveys--and we've made thousands of phone calls, up into the 5,000 and 6,000 range, randomly calling manufacturing facilities--we believe there's only a 50 percent, at best, compliance with prescription eyewear programs in manufacturing facilities.When we call these places and we ask them whether they have a safety eyewear program, the first answer that we get is always yes. We follow that up with, "Who is your provider for prescription eyewear?" There's dead silence on the phone. Most of them give out over-the-glass or planos but don't have a prescription eyewear program. So we know there's a major need for improved compliance . . . .In this area of have injuries been reduced, and are they falling or rising--the Prevent Blindness America Web site tells us that there are still over 700,000 work-related eye injuries every year. To me, 700,000 is a lot.Your point is well taken. These calls and surveys you're taking, is this more the case now than ever before? Or has it always been true that companies don't have prescription safety eyewear programs?Parsons: I would say it's pretty much always been true.To what do you attribute that? They're not thinking in those terms?Parsons: As budgets have been cut and as safety professionals a lot of the time have been cut from budgets, they still continue to hit the real priority safety things, which would be hazardous chemicals and electrical and things like that. But eye protection and some other issues that might not be considered high-visibility--they don't get the same amount of effort put behind them.How can this be reversed? And who else is working to reverse it?Parsons: We have really tried to work with Prevent Blindness, with organizations like ASSE and VPPPA, the ISEA group.It's just a matter of at what level does education overcome economics. I really believe that, as much as we try to educate--and we do a lot of that through media such as yourselves and through training classes, and wherever we can speak at VPPPA or ASSE--but it still comes down that the industry and the safety professional, either on site or coming in, has to try to address these things. And they really don't hit it that well.Franz: In effect, safety is a tough sell. You can't sell it with the threat of danger and bad things happening. People don't react to that. The fact that we had to legislate seat belts in automobiles kind of tells you that.Parsons: It's hard to find safety professionals in a lot of these plants these days to work with us.That's got to be frustrating.Parsons: It is. It's tough enough to get into a plant to start with or even talk with one because of emails and voicemails and all that. But once you do get in, to find someone who actually can implement a program or has that authority is a very difficult issue today. And I know that that's affecting compliance. Every year it becomes more difficult to enact compliance, if you will.In your surveys, you do get some of these people on the phone. You say they don't have such programs now; do you make any headway? When you explain what you're talking about, are they interested? Do they want to follow up?Parsons: I would say it's not even 1 percent. . . . A lot of companies, years ago, allowed their employees to purchase prescription eyewear through some sort of payroll deduction. What has happened with the financial cuts--I'll give you an example. I went into a manufacturing company in Maryland. The safety director was still there, the guy responsible for safety. They had an eyewear program on the books--in other words, they had documentation of what it consisted of. This guy had been in that plant in that job for over four years and said in the past two years, no one had purchased a pair of safety glasses.I said to him, "Whose fault is that? Are you not forcing the folks into compliance?" He said, "I'll tell you what happened. They moved our finance department off site. It is now done through a central finance division somewhere else. We no longer have payroll deduction available at this facility."I don't know, 80 percent of the eyewear purchased probably has some [financial] participation by the employee. There's only probably 20 percent of the companies, mostly major corporations, that pay 100 percent of the program. Where it is all employee-funded, what we are finding is the employees opt not to get a pair of glasses every year that they may be applicable. They may stretch it out to five or six years, which means they're wearing a prescription that might be outdated, which leads to quality issues and vision issues----and safety issues.Parsons: A lot of that is because they can't stretch out their payments for a pair of glasses over three or four paychecks or something. It all comes back, I think, to finance. From the company's standpoint, they've eliminated the safety person or they've eliminated some part of the program itself.That's a sobering thought. What do you think can be done?Parsons: Somewhere, obviously, this education process has to get back to the industry. I don't think we have that answer. Mike and I talked about it; there's not a simple answer to the thing.
To view full article: http://www.ohsonline.com/articles/44966/
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
YOUR NEXT EYE EXAM AT HI-TECH OPTICAL WITH DR. RON WATSON
Not Only Will An Eye Exam Help You Determine If You Require Prescription Glasses But It Can Also Help Screen For Various Eye Diseases.
Having an eye exam is the best way to protect your vision since it can detect eye problems at the earliest stages. Hi-Tech Optical now has a doctor of optometry, Dr. Ron Watson on staff every Wednesday to provide eye exams.
Dr. Watson explains, "If your coming in for your first eye exam, be prepared to answer questions such as: What kinds of problems are you experiencing now? Do you have a family history of glaucoma or cataracts? Dr. Watson wants people to be aware that, "Not only does an eye exam tell you if you need a prescription or not, but it can detect diseases that people may not be aware of like hypertension and diabetes."
Hi-Tech Optical offers eye exams with Dr. Watson by appointment on Wednesdays from 9 am to 5 pm. Hi-Tech Optical's General Manager, Marshall Brown Jr. says, "It's important for Hi-Tech to offer eye exams because we want our customers to understand the importance of annual exams and to be able to educate them on the benefits exams can be for them and their health. Having a great doctor on staff allows us to do just that."
Having an eye exam is the best way to protect your vision since it can detect eye problems at the earliest stages. Hi-Tech Optical now has a doctor of optometry, Dr. Ron Watson on staff every Wednesday to provide eye exams.
Dr. Watson explains, "If your coming in for your first eye exam, be prepared to answer questions such as: What kinds of problems are you experiencing now? Do you have a family history of glaucoma or cataracts? Dr. Watson wants people to be aware that, "Not only does an eye exam tell you if you need a prescription or not, but it can detect diseases that people may not be aware of like hypertension and diabetes."
Hi-Tech Optical offers eye exams with Dr. Watson by appointment on Wednesdays from 9 am to 5 pm. Hi-Tech Optical's General Manager, Marshall Brown Jr. says, "It's important for Hi-Tech to offer eye exams because we want our customers to understand the importance of annual exams and to be able to educate them on the benefits exams can be for them and their health. Having a great doctor on staff allows us to do just that."
Please do your yourself a favor by calling our Toll Free Number (800-638-1171) and schedule an appointment with Dr. Watson today!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
